ABSTRACT Background and aims: Treatment of hepatitis C with direct antiviral agents (DAA) is associated with almost 95% of sustained virological response. However, some patients need retreatment. In Brazil, it should be done according to the Ministry of Health guidelines, frequently updated to include newly available drugs. This study aimed to conduct a national survey about the characteristics and outcomes of retreatment of hepatitis C in previously non-responders to DAAs. Patients and methods: Institutions from all over the country were invited to participate in a national registry for retreatment, including information about clinical and epidemiological characteristics of the patients, type and outcomes of retreatment regimens. Only patients previously treated with interferon-free regimens were included. Results: As previous treatments the distribution was: SOF/DCV (56%), SOF/SIM (22%), 3D (11%), SOF/LED (6%) and SOF/RBV (5%). For retreatment the most frequently used drugs were SOF/GP (46%), SOF/DCV (23%) and SOF/VEL (11%). From 159 patients retreated, 132/159 (83%) had complete information in the registry and among them only seven patients were non-responders (SVR of 94.6%). All retreatments were well tolerated, without any serious adverse events or interruptions. Conclusion: The retreatment of patients previously non-responders to DAAs was associated with high rate of SVR in this sample of Brazilian patients. This finding allows us to conclude that the retreatment options available in the public health system in Brazil are effective and safe and are an important component of the strategy of elimination of hepatitis C in our country.

RESUMO CONTEXTO: No Brasil, desde 2015, o tratamento da hepatite C é prestado pelo Sistema Público de Saúde (SUS) com antivirais de ação direta. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a taxa de não adesão de pacientes ao tratamento da hepatite C pelo antiviral de ação direta investigando os dados epidemiológicos em um banco de dados de Curitiba, Brasil. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo com pacientes atendidos entre janeiro de 2015 e junho de 2019. Os pacientes foram considerados aderentes quando receberam todas as doses da medicação durante o tratamento. Foram avaliados os seguintes dados: sexo, idade, tipo de tratamento, tempo de tratamento, presença de diabetes ou HIV, terapia anterior, proveniente do SUS ou medicina privada, grau de fibrose e genótipo da hepatite C. RESULTADOS: Um total de 1.248 pacientes (56,8% homens) foram estudados e desses, 102/1248 (8,2%) não aderiram ao tratamento. Idade ou sexo não influenciou significativamente; 10,2% pacientes do SUS e 3,7% da medicina privada eram não aderentes (P<0,0001; OR=2,9; IC95%=1,6-9,1); 13,1% dos pacientes foram coinfectados pelo HIV e, entre eles, 15,9% abandonaram o tratamento. Indivíduos sem coinfecção apresentaram 7,0% de não adesão (P<0,0001; OR=2,5; IC=1,5-4,1). Todas as outras variáveis não mostraram diferenças na taxa de adesão. CONCLUSÃO: Nosso estudo mostrou que 8,2% dos pacientes não aderiram ao tratamento para hepatite C e que os pacientes do SUS e coinfectados pelo HIV eram significativamente menos aderentes.

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: In Brazil, since 2015, the treatment of hepatitis C is provided by SUS (Public Health System) with direct-acting antiviral (DAA). OBJECTIVE: To describe the rate of non-adherence patients to hepatitis C treatment by DAA, investigating the epidemiological data in a large database from Curitiba, Brazil. METHODS: Retrospective study with patients treated between January 2015 and June 2019. Patients were considered adherent when received all medication doses during their treatment. The following data were evaluated: gender, age, type of treatment, period of treatment, presence of diabetes or HIV, previous therapy, originated from SUS or private medicine, fibrosis grade and HCV genotype. RESULTS: 1248 patients (56.8% males) were studied and 102/1248 (8.2%) were non-adherent to treatment. Age or gender not influenced significantly; 10.2% patients from SUS and 3.7% individuals from private medicine were non-adherent (P<0.0001; OR=2.9; CI95%=1.6-9.1); 13.1% patients were co-infected with HIV and among them, 15.9% abandoned treatment. Individuals without co-infection presented 7.0% of non-adherence (P<0.0001; OR=2.5; CI=1.5-4.1). All the other variables showed no differences in the adhesion rate. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that 8.2% of patients were non-adherent to HCV treatment, and that patients from the Public Health System and co-infected with HIV were significantly less adherent.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of first-generation protease inhibitors for the treatment of genotype 1 hepatitis C virus-infected patients at Brazilian reference centers. METHODS: This multicenter cross-sectional study included hepatitis C virus genotype 1 monoinfected patients treated with Peg-interferon, ribavirin, and either boceprevir (n=158) or telaprevir (n=557) between July 2013 and April 2014 at 15 reference centers in Brazil. Demographic, clinical, virological, and adverse events data were collected during treatment and follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 715 patients, 59% had cirrhosis and 67.1% were treatment-experienced. Based on intention-to-treat analysis, the overall sustained viral response was 56.6%, with similar effectiveness in both groups (51.9% for boceprevir and 58% for telaprevir, p=0.190). Serious adverse events occurred in 44.2% of patients, and six deaths (0.8%) were recorded. Cirrhotic patients had lower sustained viral response rates than non-cirrhotic patients (46.9% vs. 70.6%, p<0.001) and a higher incidence of serious adverse events (50.7% vs. 34.8%, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that sustained viral response was associated with the absence of cirrhosis, viral recurrence after previous treatment, pretreatment platelet count greater than 100,000/mm3, and achievement of a rapid viral response. Female gender, age>65 years, diagnosis of cirrhosis, and abnormal hemoglobin levels/platelet counts prior to treatment were associated with serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Although serious adverse events rates were higher in this infected population, sustained viral response rates were similar to those reported for other patient cohorts.